Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(15)2022 07 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1957330

RESUMO

Persistent COVID-19 symptoms (long COVID) may bring challenges to long haulers' social lives. Females may endure more profound impacts given their special social roles and existing structural inequality. This study explores the effects of long COVID on the social life of female long haulers. We conducted semi-structured interviews via Zoom between April and June 2021 with 15 female long haulers in the United States, purposely recruited from Facebook and Slack groups and organization websites related to long COVID. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim with consent. The interview data were managed using MAXQDA and examined by thematic analysis. Long COVID negatively affected female long haulers' social lives by causing physical limitations, economic issues, altered social relationships, social roles' conflicts, and social stigma. Long COVID prevented female long haulers' recovery process. Physical limitations altered their perceptions on body, and family-work conflicts caused tremendous stress. They also experienced internalized stigma and job insecurities. This study provides insights into challenges that COVID-19 female long haulers could face in their return to normal social life, underscoring the vulnerability of females affected by long COVID due to significant alterations in their social lives. Shifting to new methods of communication, especially social media, diminished the adverse effects of long COVID (e.g., social isolation).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Estigma Social , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda
2.
J Am Coll Health ; : 1-10, 2022 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1795553

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For college students who are exposed to multimedia, the sources of COVID-19 vaccine information and their trust in these sources may play a role in shaping the vaccine acceptance spectrum (refusal, hesitancy, and acceptance). METHODS: Based on an online survey among 1,062 college students in South Carolina, we investigated vaccine information sources among college students and examined how COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was associated with information source and trust level in each source. RESULTS: The top three sources of COVID-19 vaccine information were health agencies, mass media, and personal social networks. Trust in mass media, health agencies, scientists, and pharmaceutical companies was negatively associated with vaccine refusal. Trust in government and scientists was negatively associated with vaccine hesitancy. DISCUSSION: Our findings highlight the importance of restoring trust in government, healthcare system, scientists, and pharmaceutical industries in the COVID-19 era.

3.
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care ; 33(3): 311-332, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1621700

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Dual epidemics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and HIV cause burnout among HIV health care workers. Guided by a socioecological framework, we investigated risk and protective factors of their burnout in Guangxi, China based on an online survey (N = 1,029) from April to May 2020. Descriptive and bivariate analyses and hierarchical regression were conducted. COVID-19-related stressors (B = 0.648 [0.482-0.816], p < .001), challenges while delivering HIV services (B = 0.236 [0.174-0.298], p < .001), and working in province/city-level institutes (B = 2.302, [0.828-3.776], p =.002) were risk factors. Protective factors were resilience (B = -0.596 [-0.687 to -0.504], p < .001), workplace social support (B = -0.410 [-0.717 to -0.044], p =.03), and institutional responsiveness to COVID-19 (B = -0.138 [-0.205 to -0.071], p < .001), respectively. Burnout-related interventions may benefit from promoting resilience, creating a supportive work environment, and strengthening institutional response to public health emergencies.


Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional , COVID-19 , Infecções por HIV , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Esgotamento Psicológico/epidemiologia , China/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Pandemias , Fatores de Proteção , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Psychol Health ; : 1-20, 2021 Dec 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1565833

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: College students are vulnerable to psychological distress during COVID-19 due to pandemic-related stressors. In response to psychological distress, college students engage in various coping behaviors, such as self-care behaviors and substance use. The transactional model of stress and coping depicts a cognitive appraisal process in the stress-coping association. Psychological resilience is an essential factor for the cognitive appraisal. This study aimed to investigate the mediation effects of resilience on psycho-behavioral health in response to COVID-19 stressors. DESIGN: Longitudinal data were collected from 1,225 Chinese college students via web-based anonymous surveys at wave 1 (T1, between Jan 31 and Feb 11, 2020) and wave 2 (T2, between Mar 20 and Apr 3, 2020). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants reported their COVID-19 stressors (T1), resilience (T1), psychological distress (depression and anxiety; T2), and coping behaviors (self-care behaviors, drinking, and smoking; T2). Path analysis was used for data analyses. RESULTS: Resilience mediated the association between COVID-19 stressors and psychological distress. Resilience together with psychological distress mediated the association of COVID-19 stressors with self-care behaviors or drinking. CONCLUSIONS: Resilience appears to offer protection that promotes psycho-behavioral health in college students in the face of COVID-19 stressors. Interventions for college students should attend to resilience.

5.
AIDS Behav ; 26(4): 1270-1278, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1453778

RESUMO

During the COVID-19 pandemic, HIV-related services have been unavoidably disrupted and impacted. However, the nature and scope of HIV service disruptions due to COVID-19 has rarely been characterized in China. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 1029 HIV healthcare providers in Guangxi, China, from April to May 2020. Latent class analysis (LCA) was first used to identify HIV service disruption levels, then hierarchical multilevel logistic regression was conducted to analyze the relationships of COVID-19 challenges, institutional responses, and HIV service disruption levels adjusting for the clustering effect of institutional ownership levels. Four classes of HIV service disruption were identified, with 22.0% complete disruption, 15.4% moderate disruption, 21.9% minor disruption, and 40.7% almost no disruption. COVID-19 challenges were positively associated with the probabilities of service disruption levels. Institutional responses were negatively associated with the probabilities of being classified as "minor disruption" and moderated the association of COVID-19 challenges with complete and moderate disruptions compared with no disruption group. To maintain continuity of core HIV services in face of a pandemic, building a resilient health care system with adequate preparedness is necessary.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções por HIV , COVID-19/epidemiologia , China/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Atenção à Saúde , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Psychol Health Med ; 27(1): 150-161, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1437765

RESUMO

COVID-19 vaccination could be a promising approach in controlling the pandemic, but its success relies on the vaccine acceptance among various populations including young adults who are vulnerable to COVID-19 due to active lifestyle and perceived invulnerability. Vaccine acceptance decisions can be influenced by multiple factors and people may weigh these factors differently in decision making. The current study aimed to explore COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among college students in South Carolina and examine how they weigh these factors according to their COVID-19 vaccine acceptance levels (i.e. acceptance, hesitance, refusal). Online survey data were collected from 1062 college students in South Carolina between September and October 2020. Multinomial logistic regresssion was used to compare perceived importance of 12 factors affecting levels of vaccine acceptance, controlling for demographic variables. About 26.1% of participants reported they would definitely take COVID-19 vaccines when available. Compared to acceptance group, refusal and hesitance groups considered side effects and vaccine characteristics (e.g. where the vaccine is produced) as important. Hesitance group considered authoritative advice from school/college as important. Acceptance group considered authoritative advice from government/doctors and local availability of the vaccines and local availability of the vaccines as important. Our findings suggest relatively low vaccine acceptance among college students in South Carolina and different factors were considered in their vaccination decision according to their acceptance levels. Tailored vaccine promotion messages should address specific concerns among the refusal and hesitancy groups. Schools should attend to valid communication strategies in vaccine campaign since the hesitancy group considered school's advice as important. College health educators also need to pay attention to the refusal group who do not value duration of protection or authoritative advice as much as their counterparts in vaccine decision making.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , South Carolina , Estudantes , Vacinação , Adulto Jovem
7.
Am J Health Promot ; 36(1): 175-179, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1286789

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The current study investigated how risk exposures, risk perceptions of COVID-19, and negative attitudes toward general vaccination were related to COVID vaccine acceptance among college students. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Data was collected by online survey using RedCap among college students in South Carolina between September 2020 and October 2020. SAMPLE: 1062 college students in South Carolina. MEASURES: risk exposures to COVID-19, perceived severity of COVID-19, perceived susceptibility of COVID-19, negative attitude toward general vaccination, vaccine acceptance of COVID-19. ANALYSIS: Hierarchical linear regression was used to examine the association of these factors with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance controlling for key demographics. RESULTS: Perceived severity of COVID-19 was positively associated with vaccine acceptance (ß = 0.19, p < 0.001). Higher level of risk exposures (ß = -0.08, p = 0.007) and negative attitude toward general vaccination (ß = -0.38, p < 0.001) were associated with low vaccine acceptance. CONCLUSION: We need tailored education messages for college students to emphasize the severity of COVID-19, address the concerns of side effects of general vaccines by dispelling the misconception, and target the most vulnerable subgroups who reported high level of risk exposures while showed low intention to take the vaccine.

8.
Curr Psychol ; : 1-11, 2021 Jun 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1269181

RESUMO

Before herd immunity is reached, preventive practices still play an important role in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Adherence to preventive behaviors could be determined by individuals' health beliefs, which would be influenced by antecedent factors such as previous exposure to pandemic stressors. Applying the health belief model (HBM), this study aims to examine the mediation association among COVID-19 stressors, HBM constructs, and preventive behaviors. Longitudinal data were collected from 1225 Chinese college students using web-based surveys at wave 1 (w1; between January 31 and February 11, 2020) and wave 2 (w2; between March 20 and April 3, 2020). Participants reported their COVID-19 stressors (w1), five HBM constructs (w2), and preventive behaviors (w1 and w2). Paired t-tests suggested that social distancing and self-quarantine behaviors decreased while precautionary behaviors increased from w1 to w2. Path analysis indicated that two HBM constructs (perceived barriers and self-efficacy) mediated the association between COVID-19 stressors and precautionary behaviors. These findings suggested that tailored prevention intervention for college students should attend to perceived barriers and self-efficacy. Individuals who exposed to multiple pandemic stressors merit particular attention and intervention should account for their early pandemic stress experiences.

9.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 1867, 2020 Dec 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-962812

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Individuals' stress in responding to the current COVID-19 pandemic may be exacerbated by information uncertainty driven by inconsistent, unverified, and conflicting news from various sources. The current study aims to test if information uncertainty during the COVID-19 outbreak was related to acute stress disorder (ASD) over and above other psychosocial stressors. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was conducted with 7800 college students throughout China from January 31 through February 11, 2020. Existing scales were modified to measure ASD and six potential stressors including information uncertainty during the COVID-19 outbreak. Hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to assess the unique association of information uncertainty with ASD. To minimize the effect of large sample size and also to get a sense of whether the effects of information uncertainty were similar to people at the center of the epidemic, we repeated the hierarchical regression among 10% of the students who were randomly selected from the entire sample ("10% random sample"; n = 780) and 226 students from Hubei Province where the outbreak started. RESULTS: Information uncertainty was highly prevalent among the respondents (64%). It was significantly associated with ASD beyond other key variables and potential stressors across three samples. In the hierarchical regression among the entire sample, demographic variables accounted for 9.4% of the variance in ASD. The other five stressors added 5.1% of the variance. The information uncertainty (ß = .159; p < .001) explained an additional 2.1% of the variance. Likewise, the information uncertainty explained an additional 2.1 and 3.4% of the variance in ASD beyond all other variables among the 10% random sample (ß = .165; p < .001) and the Hubei sample (ß = .196; p < .01), respectively. CONCLUSION: Information uncertainty is a unique correlate of psychological stress during the COVID-19 outbreak. Reducing information uncertainty is essential not only for halting virus transmission but also for mitigating negative impacts of the pandemic on people's psychosocial wellbeing. Transparent, timely, and accurate communication can reduce public confusion, fear, and stress. Capacity building in governments, communities, and media outlets to prevent, reduce and manage information uncertainty should be a critical part of the response to an emerging global health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19/psicologia , Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor/normas , Surtos de Doenças , Transtornos de Estresse Traumático Agudo/epidemiologia , Incerteza , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiologia , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Estudantes/psicologia , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
10.
medRxiv ; 2020 Nov 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-955703

RESUMO

Growing attention has been paid to vaccination in control of the COVID-19 pandemic and young adults is one of the key populations for vaccination. Advanced understanding of young adults' willingness to take a COVID-19 vaccine and the potential factors influencing their vaccine intention will contribute to the development and implementation of effective strategies to promote COVID-19 vaccine uptake among this group. The current study investigated how risk exposures and risk perceptions of COVID-19 (e.g., perceived susceptibility, severity, and fear of COVID-19) as well as negative attitudes toward general vaccination were related to COVID vaccine acceptance among college students based on online survey data from 1062 college students in South Carolina . Hierarchical linear regression was used to examine the association of these factors with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance controlling for key demographics. Results suggested that perceived severity and fear of COVID-19 were positively associated with vaccine acceptance, while higher level of risk exposures (work/study place exposure) and negative attitude toward general vaccination were associated with low vaccine acceptance. Our findings suggested that we need tailored education messages for college students to emphasize the severity of COVID-19, particularly potential long-term negative consequences on health, address the concerns of side effects of general vaccines by dispelling the misconception, and target the most vulnerable subgroups who reported high level of risk exposures while showed low intention to take the vaccine. Efforts are warranted to increase college students' perceived susceptibility and severity and promote their self-efficacy in health management and encourage them to take protective behaviors including vaccine uptake.

11.
AIDS Behav ; 25(1): 18-27, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-893299

RESUMO

HIV healthcare providers might be vulnerable to mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic. Guided by the stress and coping paradigm, the current study aimed at examining the interactive effects of COVID-19-related stressors and coping on mental health problems. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 1029 HIV healthcare providers in Guangxi, China. The prevalence of depression and anxiety in the current study was 13.31% and 6.61%, respectively. Results from path analyses revealed that the main effects of COVID-19-related stressors and coping were significant on both depression and anxiety. The interaction of coping and COVID-19-related stressors had significant effects on depression and anxiety. Simple slope tests revealed that more coping behaviors buffered against the negative effect of COVID-19-related stressors on mental health problems. Coping acted as a protective factor that alleviated the harm of COVID-19-related stressors on mental health. Intervention targeting coping management might benefit the mental health of HIV healthcare providers.


Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , COVID-19/psicologia , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Adulto , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , China/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/epidemiologia , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Prevalência , SARS-CoV-2
12.
AIDS Behav ; 25(1): 9-17, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-888224

RESUMO

Psychological distress among healthcare providers is concerning during COVID-19 pandemic due to extreme stress at healthcare facilities, including HIV clinics in China. The socioecological model suggests that psychological distress could be influenced by multi-level factors. However, limited COVID-19 research examined the mechanisms of psychological distress among HIV healthcare providers. This study examined organizational and intrapersonal factors contributing to psychological health during COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected via online anonymous surveys from 1029 HIV healthcare providers in Guangxi, China during April-May 2020. Path analysis was utilized to test a mediation model among COVID-19 stressors, institutional support, resilience, and psychological distress (PHQ-4). Thirty-eight percent of the providers experienced psychological distress (PHQ-4 score > 3). Institutional support and resilience mediated the relationship between COVID-19 stressors and psychological distress. Psychological distress was common among Chinese HIV healthcare providers during COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological health intervention should attend to institutional support and resilience.


Assuntos
COVID-19/psicologia , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Angústia Psicológica , Resiliência Psicológica , Local de Trabalho/psicologia , Adaptação Psicológica , Adulto , China/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Apoio Social , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA